Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: The Benefits of Self-Regulation
نویسنده
چکیده
In this lecture I argue for the value of a self-regulatory approach to law and criminal justice. I do so by first describing and critiquing the dominant approach to regulation in use today: deterrence. I suggest that in practice this model is costly and minimally effective in securing compliance with the law and motivating the acceptance of decisions made by police officers and judges. I then outline a different, selfregulatory model which focuses on engaging people’s values as a basis for motivating voluntary deference to the law. I review empirical research suggesting that this strategy is both viable and more desirable than current sanction-based approaches. My argument is that this approach is particularly important when the goal is voluntary compliance with the law and/or willing cooperation with legal authorities.
منابع مشابه
Racial disparity and the legitimacy of the criminal justice system: exploring consequences for deterrence.
Minority (over) representation in the criminal justice system remains a puzzle, both from a policy and an intervention perspective. Cross-sectional reviews of the policies and practices of the criminal justice system often find differential rates of involvement in the criminal justice system that are associated with the nature of the criminal charge/act or characteristics of the offender; howev...
متن کاملConfining Legitimacy: The Impact of Prison Experiences on Perceptions of Criminal Justice Legitimacy.
There are currently 2 million people incarcerated in the United States. For social workers whose practice includes people who have experienced confinement, building knowledge about the impact of the incarceration on individual lives is critical. Understanding how the prison experience shapes perceptions of self and others can inform the design of case management plans and program interventions ...
متن کاملCriminal Mediation as a Doctrine of Restorative Justice from the Perspective of Law and Ethics
Background: Creating the ground for peace and reconciliation through recourse to arbitration has been one of the common methods of litigation that is rooted in ethics. In the criminal justice system, judicial and police officials are the reference for investigation, inquiry and investigation. The sovereign and their representatives have the exclusive competence and no other person has the autho...
متن کاملUncommon types of mourning in the light of criminal law and judicial procedures
In Islamic societies and among the Shiites in particular, in accordance with the necessity of respecting the divine rituals, mourning for the prophet and his esteemed family as an instance of divine rituals, is considered to be admired and appreciated. However, the mourning rituals, like many other sorts of social and religious issues, are the subject of the variety of interpretations and insta...
متن کاملExpediency, Legitimacy, and the Rule of Law: A Systems Perspective on Civil/Criminal Procedural Hybrids
In recent years an increasing quantity of UK legislation has introduced blended or ‘hybridised’ procedures that blur the previously clear demarcation between civil and criminal legal processes, typically on the grounds of normatively-motivated political expediency. This paper provides a critical perspective on instances of procedural hybridisation in order to illustrate that, first, the relianc...
متن کامل